Thank You;)
Best wishes
Anka

Мда... мало того, что как-то наколбасили, так вот думаю, а если бы Вам уважаемый Михаил Дмитриевич -это на цыганский перевели - вот это был бы номер. Цыганские короли в португалии, латинской америке и некоторых других странах, тож бы про номер задумались и ещё один бы впрос всплыл...а вот Полонский с персоналом кровь сдали. Вы бы тоже чтоли кров себе что ли пустили - как то освежились бы, встрепенулись...Хотя Вам с Вашими прынцыпами...

Михаил Дмитриевич!

Блог практически заснул. Интересных тем нет, комментарии появляются после больших перерывов. После 23 июня появилось только 4 сообщения, из которых только одно можно отнести к лично вашему творчеству (извините перу). Последнее я про список книг из серии «Философия».

Вы потеряли интерес к данному проекту? Публичность закончилась, Вы возвращаетесь в тень, к своему любимому принципу «деньги любят тишину»? Не надолго же Вас хватило. Хотя этого и следовало ожидать – зачем всем глаза мозолить! ))

Anonymous,а какое развитие событий на блоге Вы сочли бы идеальным?посты по 3 раза в день?)))Тогда б не стало того, что любит тишину,я полагаю)))Ибо для них надо работать а не только в блогах сидеть))
А вообще вновь вспомнился Грибоедов))

А меж тем вчера ФК Москва выгрыли у ЦСКА.
Тем хоть отбавляй, просто, наверное, со временем плохо. Да и интерес к блогу у автора явно потерян. Видимо, СНОБ вскоре ждет та же участь?

Anonymous,ну признайтесь:Вам охота обсудить возможное объединение с Торпедо))поэтому и "тем хоть отбавляй";)))

Good evening Mikhail Dmitrievich,
Thank you for this English translation of your July 2nd speech :) I enjoy very much reading articles/interviews which Onexim translates into English..a pity that these translations are so rare. You have some great ideas in your head and I wish you all the best in carrying these out. But seeing many of these ideas already having been firmly established in America, I can tell you that a lot of these ideas (more than you think) are going to depend on the cooperation of the Russian government. I can tell you that a great number of these ideas will not work (or will make your life much harder to say the least)if your government has "its own ideas" such as that of wanting to take the power away from the businesses/oligarchs and give it back to itself-in other words a communistic or socialistic society. In this case, tread the waters carefully my dear :) When you first started talking about globalisation a while back (this past winter) I shared with you a lot of my feelings about globalisation so I will try not to repeat myself too much. Basically, in order for your plans to work without collapsing in some area, you have to strike the balance between globalisation and nationalism as America has seen both of these extremes over the past 60 years. In fact, a great deal of today's economic woes which America faces are the results of globalisation taken to the extreme-some signs of this "extreme" are (a chain effect)disappearing of small businesses, outsourcing of American major corporations/jobs, shrinking of the American middle class, greater disparity between rich and poor, collapse of the dollar, collapse of the housing market, all-time high American home foreclosures. Again I wish you the best of luck in working to make your plans a success and I hope that you and all your associates get the Russian government on your side. After all, you're going to need it as well as a whole lot of time:) Enjoy your evening and take care.Thanks again for the translation of your business congress speech ;)

All the best,
Heather

Their reply was:
Subject: Re: alternative energies and globalisation..
"In fact, a great deal of today's economic woes which America faces are the results of globalisation taken to the extreme-some signs of this "extreme" are (a chain effect)disappearing of small businesses, outsourcing of American major corporations/jobs, shrinking of the American middle class, greater disparity between rich and poor, collapse of the dollar, collapse of the housing market, all-time high American home foreclosures."

oh dear... *sigh*


Здравствуйте Anonymous,
Это всё ?? не меня будете воевать? Ничего говорить? Интересно…
Спокойной ночй и удачи,

Heather :)

Mikhail Dmitrievich,
You are showing USA as a model to be looked at in times when America itself is staring at the Japanise effectiveness and efficiency. Whereas Japan's economy is facing difficulties (like all the rest of the economies) it is generally believed that it has stronger economic outlook than it appears... and japanese goods,services and technological advancement and implementation are synonymous to very high quality, reliability and timely delivery, which the economies rated as #1 and #2 can not boast with.:)
Global integration has brought tremendous benefits for some corporations, yet... the deficiencies of the global system can be grouped under five main headings: the uneven distribution of benefits, the instability of the financial system, the incipient threat of global monopolies and oligopolies, the ambiguous role of the state, and the question of values and social cohesion. Instability is not confined to the financial system. The goal of competitors is to prevail, not to preserve competition in the market and the natural tendency for monopolies and oligopolies to arise needs to be constrained by regulations. Whose job is it to prevent undue concentration of power and to preserve stability in financial markets? This brings me to the role of the state. Since the end of the Second World War the state has played an increasing role in maintaining economic stability, striving to ensure equality of opportunity, and providing a social safety net, particularly in the highly industrialized countries of Europe and North America. But the capacity of the state to look after the welfare of its citizens has been severely impaired by the globalization, which allows capital to escape taxation much more easily than labor can. Capital will tend to avoid countries where employment is heavily taxed or heavily protected, leading to a rise in unemployment. This brings me to the most nebulous problem area, the question of values and social cohesion. Every society needs some shared values to hold it together. Market values on their own cannot serve that purpose, because they reflect only what one market participant is willing to pay another in a free exchange. Markets reduce everything, including human beings (labor) and nature (land) to commodities ...One global society contains many different customs, traditions, and religions. Where can it find the shared values that would hold it together?
http://english.pravda.ru/russia/economics/25-06-2008/105590-russian_economy-0

Anonymous,
Said with all due respect to you - there is no assurance that the native language will be the one that a person speaks to perfection either,unless the individual is a graduate from linguistical specialty. I see it daily on your TV. Yes, yes... I do watch NTV daily and the quality of the language that I observe there coming from journalists is not at par to say the least.
Don't scold MDP and his team - everyone makes mistakes. Are these typal and/or grammar errors the most bothering issue that you can see in his presentation ? Because I see others that will have more profound effects. :)

On a more brighter note to MDP - Although I have some observations on your presentation, it is great to see information brought together with a smile. :)

Dear Mikhail,

Thank you very much for the English version of your thesis. I have carefully read it again.
I just want to add something to my previous comment. I do believe that any changes provided will not lead to reinventing the wheel. The innovation breakthrough is not an easy process and some lessons really should be learnt from other countries. The Chinese model is very special and it should be mentioned that Chinese goods in any markets have an advantage characteristic, they are cheaper than the relative ones of other countries and thus win in the price competition becoming so popular among customers.
From the economical point of view this winning significantly increase demand as well as supply of the product and displace other relative goods from the market. China becomes a monopolist in many fields and that is not a good tendency. At least it decrease the quality of products. The government can regulate the competition in the market and support domestic producers, but its legislation will depends on priorities of the political development of the country.
I share many of your desires in this process and wish you to realize them.

Good luck,
Elmira

Good evening, Elmira.
I too consider, that quality is one of the most important properties of the goods and it is necessary to aspire to it.

Работайте над своей жизнью, а не над работой...) С ув., Марина

Dear Michael, good evening!
The good report, but I consider, that from the point of view of formation it is necessary to develop not only the exact sciences. Here it is necessary to take more deeply. The person grows and is formed in family in which unessentially everyone should be chemists, by physicists and mathematicians and consequently it is necessary to do an emphasis not only on these fields of knowledge. In the nature, as well as in the world all is interconnected. The ideology human needs to be changed …
Certainly, very important to find communication between business and the state. And this communication, first of all, should be based on a good legislative basis. What we have thought up, without good laws there will be no precise work.
I did not become, to be based only on the American and Chinese models. To me the Japanese and Israeli models are very nice. In fact Russia, to comparison with Japan the huge country, but Japan in many respects ahead.
With the best regards, Larissa.

Some folks, not having lived perhaps as much as you, endured as much, or loved as much, simply cannot see the truth of a situation, disagreement, or relationship as clearly as you. And so, it's wise to keep in mind,MICHAEL that it's not their fault.

Can you see this?

Доброе время суток, Михаил Дмитриевич
Я Михаил Александрович,31 год.
Михаил Дмитриевич, очень приятно, что у Вас есть свой блог, и идёт диалог с Вами на интер..темы, где Вы узнаёте новенькое, и от Вас можно узнать интересующ..вопросы. Приятно было прочитать, о Вас песню в Кушевели в энете, запомнились слова, А мне всё икается, Всем всё вспоминается.
У меня есть к Вам вопрос, как можно объяснить народа к Вашей особе популярность. Среди миллиардеров только Вы такой.
Успехов,Вам.

«Первая - наша страна, к сожалению, разучилась ставить системные задачи и их системно реализовывать»
Какая страна имеется в виду, РФ, Михаил? Единственный раз была поставлена системная задача, так называемая приватизация. Реализована была, действительно, системно, сменили систему. Точнее, сломали. Новую не построили, и не пытаемся. Производство, инфраструктура в СССР были рассчитаны под другие цели и задачи, сейчас цель и задача одна- прибыль. Ножки, как известно, протягивают по одёжке, а её приобретают в соответствии со средствами и размерами. Ваш пиджак с карманами одеть на нашего Президента, Вы не предлагали ему померить? Так и нашему, настоящему государству достался пиджак, из карманов всё вытащили, да по новому раскроили, сшить, ещё не сшили. Зато дела, как шьют!С уважением, Сергей